<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>OhGizmo! - Latest Comments in Analog Digital Photo Frame Earns A Double-Take</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ohgizmo.disqus.com/analog_digital_photo_frame_earns_a_double_take/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:08:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Analog Digital Photo Frame Earns A Double-Take</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/08/analog-digital-photo-frame-earns-a-double-take/#comment-2935186</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not true, that just means the window is too small to view the entire image at 100%. Though oddly enough it never seems to cut off any of the picture...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LukeAnderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:08:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Analog Digital Photo Frame Earns A Double-Take</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/08/analog-digital-photo-frame-earns-a-double-take/#comment-2933999</link><description>&lt;p&gt;but theres a mistake - if its 100%, there wouldn´t be any scroll bars...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iSi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:47:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>