<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>OhGizmo! - Latest Comments in Canon ImagePRESS C7000VP Is Too Much Printer</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ohgizmo.disqus.com/canon_imagepress_c7000vp_is_too_much_printer/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:30:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Canon ImagePRESS C7000VP Is Too Much Printer</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/02/04/canon-imagepress-c7000vp-is-too-much-printer/#comment-676353557</link><description>&lt;p&gt;First  of all, the Canon  c7000 is only capable of doing 50 ipm at 600 dpi NOT 70 as stated. And compared to the Konica Minolta Bizhub Pro 6501 is actually obsolete junk. The 6501 has an 8 bit compared to Canon's single bit , which means more vivid color. Also the 6501 has a higher paper capacity feeder and higher print speed and so many other superior features, with greater technology, and priced far below the canon. The canon is great if you have a print shop in Beverly Hills and dont mind paying for something that is far less quality than the Konica Minolta workhorse  that blows the doors on garbage like the canon 7000. Just my opinion? .,.......No, Fact!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:30:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canon ImagePRESS C7000VP Is Too Much Printer</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/02/04/canon-imagepress-c7000vp-is-too-much-printer/#comment-22988802</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the dumbest review I have ever read.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michaelray</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:15:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canon ImagePRESS C7000VP Is Too Much Printer</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/02/04/canon-imagepress-c7000vp-is-too-much-printer/#comment-19966730</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dear,&lt;br&gt;please send to us your best quotataion about machine: imagePRESS C7000VP&lt;br&gt;We are looking forward you prompt reply&lt;br&gt;BEST REGARDS&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">diagne</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:52:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canon ImagePRESS C7000VP Is Too Much Printer</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/02/04/canon-imagepress-c7000vp-is-too-much-printer/#comment-7813339</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wow, what an amazing printer. very huge and has multifunction..&lt;br&gt;____________________________________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;Micheal Smith&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Micheal Smith </dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:54:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canon ImagePRESS C7000VP Is Too Much Printer</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/02/04/canon-imagepress-c7000vp-is-too-much-printer/#comment-1765649</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Although Canon say they can do " Everything ". As an C7000VP Operator  of 6 months in the UK i can honestly say " They Cant ".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They are - Unreliable - Have a major problem with toner blocking the Drums - The quick fix by Canon Engineers didn't work - If your running a big print run job with mainly c/m/k the yellow drum will destroy itself - Canon call out service in the uk is awfull - I used to run a Xerox 2060 and we thought that was bad, untill we got this pile of s**t.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Canon Man</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:51:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canon ImagePRESS C7000VP Is Too Much Printer</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/02/04/canon-imagepress-c7000vp-is-too-much-printer/#comment-1765648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ASa manager of a print shop that has a machine fairly similar to this I agreee with Forrest "Everything"  Just last night I was able to complete a job that normally would take 4-5 people a day by myself in 13 hours.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicholas</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:20:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canon ImagePRESS C7000VP Is Too Much Printer</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/02/04/canon-imagepress-c7000vp-is-too-much-printer/#comment-1765645</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congress has one of these in each of the Senate and House office buildings.  They're for all large printing orders.  Each one has an exhaust hose that blasts all the hot air it produces through the air vents.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:55:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canon ImagePRESS C7000VP Is Too Much Printer</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/02/04/canon-imagepress-c7000vp-is-too-much-printer/#comment-1765646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Honestly though, what do you do with a printer like this?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a former Kinko's key-op, I can safely answer "Everything!"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Forrest</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:18:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Canon ImagePRESS C7000VP Is Too Much Printer</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/02/04/canon-imagepress-c7000vp-is-too-much-printer/#comment-1765647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you are looking at it the wrong way. it's not just a fancy printer, it's a 70ppm book making machine from a legitimate printer company, instead of a one-off homebrew machine&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:59:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>