-
Website
http://www.ohgizmo.com/ -
Original page
http://www.ohgizmo.com/2006/02/20/5000-year-old-recordings-caught-on-pottery/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
facebook-19701276
45 comments · 2 points
-
Zotel
61 comments · 1 points
-
blairf_felgenheimer
126 comments · 2 points
-
Martin Murd
25 comments · 1 points
-
chaosoldier
167 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
OhGizmo! Quick Review: The LG Chocolate Touch VX8575
5 days ago · 42 comments
-
Gestural Computing Is The New Multitouch
22 hours ago · 3 comments
-
Unlock Your Doors With 3D Facial Recognition
1 day ago · 4 comments
-
Sugru: The Material That Goes From Silly Putty To Flexible Silicone Overnight
1 day ago · 3 comments
-
Th Emperor 1510, The Ultimate Workstation For Now A Tenth Of The Price
23 hours ago · 2 comments
-
OhGizmo! Quick Review: The LG Chocolate Touch VX8575
I don't know how old is that news but i heard from it a few year ago...
i'm french, the scientist sound serious,
but if you understand latin, you should listen something at the end of the movie.....
If you can see this CSI episode...
CSI - Committed - Air date: April 28,2005
http://www.tv.com/csi/committed/episode/412257/...
Extract from
http://www.csifiles.com/reviews/csi/committed.s...
"Sophia Curtis places Adam's pot on a turntable in the CSI lab and uses a laser to pick up some sound that was recorded in the grooves"
I 'am a Sound and Acoustic Engineer, and in my professional opinion this is not true
Why?
If you listen to the first recordings made in modern times, they sound very bad, and they have a big horn to move a little niddle to record.
If some object can touch the surface of the pottery, must be in a very precise distance
If you add that the sound in the area must be VERY VERY loud to move the object...
Also add the noise by the rotation of the base ...
And also de "noise" of the irregular pottery...
- Low frequency (by the rotation): VERY Loud
- Low frequency (by the rotation): Loud
- Mid-High frequency (by the speaker): Loud (but not much)
If yout think a speaker can be louder than the rotation ... maybe, but to a distance, no just millimeters from the pottery...
And always, the loud frequency is easyer to record, because have more power than the high.
And Also, some words are "too clear", even in early recording they have several problems with the recording of high frequency.
When I see this article i was shock. But after a little thinking... may be just a joke.
(Sorry for my bad english, but i from Chile, so I speak spanish)
Jim
Jim
i.e. the framing of the guy they're interviewing... half his head is out of the shot.
It was probably a fake
-Scott
24-Feb-2006
We could not resist the idea that ancient sounds had been recovered from pottery grooves. The idea was so fascinating that we didn't stop to read the website involved carefully enough. It's actually a brilliant hoax posted last April 1. This is especially ironic, because we have a notoriously bad habit of posting hoax stories on April 1 ourselves. So kudos to those of you who wrote saying this could not possibly be real, and thanks to the alert reader who pointed out to us that the site is featured in the web's wonderful Museum of Hoaxes.
For a simple reason - there was no Latin language in 3,000 BC.
Also, when such sounds are eventually recovered they are most likely going to be in one- or two-second fragments, tops, not extended speech.
-The first vase is said to be 500 years old ("5 siecles") and not 5000 as I have read in many comments.
-The second one is said to be 2000 years.
Therefore, figures presented here match with History (cf Latin Language). What I am much more skeptical about is the reliability of this so-called scientist. It sounds like a big joke to me.
I believe in all of the above :)
Now, I haven't seen the video posted on this site, though... maybe THAT is fake...