<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>OhGizmo! - Latest Comments in OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; And There Was Much Rejoicing: Cell Phone Charger Standardization</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:06:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; And There Was Much Rejoicing: Cell Phone Charger Standardization</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/09/24/and-there-was-much-rejoicing-cell-phone-charger-standardization/#comment-4087337</link><description>In 2006 we have tried to get a standard for AC/DC chargers and adapter (&amp;lt;15W) off the ground. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Please see an outline of the concept (called 'UniCharge') here: &lt;a href="http://www.unicharge.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;UniCharge&lt;/a&gt; --&amp;gt; vision document</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sjef Peeraer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:06:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; And There Was Much Rejoicing: Cell Phone Charger Standardization</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/09/24/and-there-was-much-rejoicing-cell-phone-charger-standardization/#comment-1763587</link><description>About frickin' time!  Micro-USBs are coming into more and more usage.  Case in point, my Bluetooth headphones and transmitter.  Besides, why adopt a chunky, older-generation USB port when they can go for the uber-sleek micro?  It is GOOD for business because it adopts the NEW standard, not the older ones.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SImon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:09:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; And There Was Much Rejoicing: Cell Phone Charger Standardization</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/09/24/and-there-was-much-rejoicing-cell-phone-charger-standardization/#comment-1763588</link><description>Of course they couldn't agree upon a pre-existing standard.  That's just bad for business.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin K.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:37:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>