<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>OhGizmo! - Latest Comments in OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Canon Hopes To Use The Photographer&amp;#8217;s Iris For Copyright Protection</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:00:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Canon Hopes To Use The Photographer&amp;#8217;s Iris For Copyright Protection</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/02/13/canon-hopes-to-use-the-photographers-iris-for-copyright-protection/#comment-1765763</link><description>I do not care about copyright of my photos! Give me my fukcing privacy!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kris</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:00:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; Canon Hopes To Use The Photographer&amp;#8217;s Iris For Copyright Protection</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/02/13/canon-hopes-to-use-the-photographers-iris-for-copyright-protection/#comment-1765762</link><description>The yellow dot codes in their printers, however, aren't for copyright protection. They're a 'feature' added purely for government surveillance. I can see this iris-watermarking going down the same road. I'm not buying from companies that make quiet deals so that intelligence agencies can track who I am and what I do with my own equipment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:36:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>