<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>OhGizmo! - Latest Comments in [CES 2008] Fujitsu PalmSecure Vein Verification Mouse</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_ces_2008_fujitsu_palmsecure_vein_verification_mouse/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:52:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: [CES 2008] Fujitsu PalmSecure Vein Verification Mouse</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/01/08/ces-2008-fujitsu-palmsecure-vein-verification-mouse/#comment-24675808</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am a second year Master's student in the Department of electronic engineering, I need all that is new in this area because it represents the master's thesis (  face recognition )&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">heshamhomesh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:52:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: [CES 2008] Fujitsu PalmSecure Vein Verification Mouse</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/01/08/ces-2008-fujitsu-palmsecure-vein-verification-mouse/#comment-1765154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Noone is actually sure whether any biometric is entirely unique, but the way that veins grow means that there should be little replication (lots of veins, lots of ways they can grow). I don't think it is known if they are unchangeble over time, either. However, for a mouse controlling access to a computer system (i.e. relatively few users, not like a national ID system), vein patterns should be adequate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeremy Wickins</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:37:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>