http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/enTue, 27 Apr 2010 14:10:13 -0000http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/06/12/denon-offers-up-500-premium-ethernet-cable/#comment-46997714<p>Oh!...that's great helpful, it's so right to me! Million thanks for the article,<br></p>50 ft Ethernet CableTue, 27 Apr 2010 14:10:13 -0000http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/06/12/denon-offers-up-500-premium-ethernet-cable/#comment-1767232<p>Ha! <a href="http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20080618&amp;mode=classic" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20080618&amp;mode=classic">http://ars.userfriendly.org...</a></p>AnonymousWed, 18 Jun 2008 04:56:41 -0000http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/06/12/denon-offers-up-500-premium-ethernet-cable/#comment-1767233<p>"was designed for the audio enthusiast" - I think this says it all.</p><p>NO cable is immune from bit errors. They're easily caught by the error correction, and even in the cheapest cable they're only one in a billion or so to begin with. Or is the "Denon Link feature" such a crappy protocol, with no error correction whatsoever, that you can only PRAY that no frame gets dropped?</p><p>To transmit perfect digital audio you need nothing more than unshielded bell wire. Especially at these laughable data rates and cable lengths. If you need a better cable, you're doing it wrong.</p><p>Any company that advertises like this has lost all credibility.</p>YoctoThu, 12 Jun 2008 05:59:16 -0000