<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>OhGizmo! - Latest Comments in faceSCAN III &amp;#8211; DIY 3D Portraits</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_facescan_iii_diy_3d_portraits/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:47:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: faceSCAN III &amp;#8211; DIY 3D Portraits</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/02/19/facescan-iii-diy-3d-portraits/#comment-1761137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not that impressive... Genex, A4 Vision, or the Trusty Minolta Vivid series all do similar things.  Frankly a 0.8 sec capture time is actually average to slow in the field, not fast.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:47:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>