<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>OhGizmo! - Latest Comments in Goodbye, F-117A. We&amp;#8217;ll Miss Not Seeing You</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_goodbye_f_117a_we8217ll_miss_not_seeing_you/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:32:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Goodbye, F-117A. We&amp;#8217;ll Miss Not Seeing You</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/12/goodbye-f-117a-well-miss-not-seeing-you/#comment-7439059</link><description>&lt;p&gt;F117A is in my eyes the only plane that can live up to it's name, a Stealth bomber... B2s are just massive chunky bombers with only some stealth about them...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nucking futs</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:32:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Goodbye, F-117A. We&amp;#8217;ll Miss Not Seeing You</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/12/goodbye-f-117a-well-miss-not-seeing-you/#comment-1766131</link><description>&lt;p&gt;not surprising. the f117 was designed for stealth above all else. the b2 is so big that the radar cross section is gonna be bigger anyway. the f22 was deisgned as a compromise between agility  and stealth. No surprises here&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">VINCE</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:46:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Goodbye, F-117A. We&amp;#8217;ll Miss Not Seeing You</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/12/goodbye-f-117a-well-miss-not-seeing-you/#comment-1766134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So, according to Modern Marvels: Stealth Technology, the F-117A has a radar cross section "of an insect," while the F-22's is "smaller than a sparrow." The B-2 has a radar cross section between 4 and 5 times larger than the F-117A.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evan Ackerman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:46:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Goodbye, F-117A. We&amp;#8217;ll Miss Not Seeing You</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/12/goodbye-f-117a-well-miss-not-seeing-you/#comment-1766133</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I could be wrong about this, but I think I remember hearing somewhere that the F-117A has a lower observable profile (radar, infrared, etc.) than either the F-22 or the B-2. I imagine that in certain very specific situations, they could still be the best planes for the job... But you're right on both counts.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evan Ackerman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:23:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Goodbye, F-117A. We&amp;#8217;ll Miss Not Seeing You</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/03/12/goodbye-f-117a-well-miss-not-seeing-you/#comment-1766132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's doubtful they will ever fly again. They have a very limited payload, and need costly maintenance after each flight. The real reason why they are not going to be sold or given away is to preserve what is still leading-edge stealth technology.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fazal Majid</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:12:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>