DISQUS

joe · 3 years ago

just a bit larger
http://www.nevadasurveyor.com/atomicbomb/
someone · 3 years ago

According to the second link, the images were taken at 1/10,000'th of a second (100us, AKA 1/10th of a ms), not a nanosecond which AFAIK was not possible back in Edgerton's day. 100us is probably the right number.
soopergooman · 3 years ago

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/Tsspi...
http://www.cynical-c.com/archives/bloggraphics/...
someone · 3 years ago

Although the pictures are aesthetically appealing, I'd rather not have the atomic bomb be called one of the greatest gadgets.
I think I've somewhere seen a book published with similar pictures.