<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>OhGizmo! - Latest Comments in Kodak Unveils Cheaper And Lighter &amp;#8220;dSLR Alternative&amp;#8221; Digicam</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_kodak_unveils_cheaper_and_lighter_8220dslr_alternative8221_digicam/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:12:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Kodak Unveils Cheaper And Lighter &amp;#8220;dSLR Alternative&amp;#8221; Digicam</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/02/kodak-unveils-cheaper-and-lighter-dslr-digicam/#comment-1751967</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This camera is as close to professional as you are going to get. The colors are vivid and clean. Light weight and easy to operate. SLR and Digital together at its best.Not a disappointment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randy Beare</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:12:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kodak Unveils Cheaper And Lighter &amp;#8220;dSLR Alternative&amp;#8221; Digicam</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/02/kodak-unveils-cheaper-and-lighter-dslr-digicam/#comment-1751966</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the note, you are absolutely right. Kodak is touting these as dSLR alternatives, I will chnage the title but I did mention dSLR Quality digicam in my post. Thanks for reading!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">awesome</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 04:51:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kodak Unveils Cheaper And Lighter &amp;#8220;dSLR Alternative&amp;#8221; Digicam</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/02/kodak-unveils-cheaper-and-lighter-dslr-digicam/#comment-1751965</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't want to be picky, but there's nothing SLRish with that camera (apart from the looks) - no mirror, no SLR. It's that easy, i guess.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Herr Herrner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 04:36:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>