<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>OhGizmo! - Latest Comments in Singapore&amp;#8217;s Floating Apartment Building</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_singapore8217s_floating_apartment_building/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:56:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Singapore&amp;#8217;s Floating Apartment Building</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/03/27/singapores-floating-apartment-building/#comment-1761670</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually a building of this sort (hanging on a central core) was put up in Vancouver BC Canada about 30+ years ago. It is only about 20 stories and one single building around a single core.  I guess that would make the Twin Towers hanging building 2.0 and the one now planned for Singapore is v 3.0.  The one in Vancouver was touted as being "more" earthquake proof than anything then erected in the city at that time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:56:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Singapore&amp;#8217;s Floating Apartment Building</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/03/27/singapores-floating-apartment-building/#comment-1761669</link><description>&lt;p&gt;doesn't this remind you of a scifi movie?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nomadicalloy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:25:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Singapore&amp;#8217;s Floating Apartment Building</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/03/27/singapores-floating-apartment-building/#comment-1761673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;apparently it's not by OMA itself, but by one of their partners - Ole Scheeren - working outside the firm.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.worldarchitecturenews.com/index.php?fuseaction=wanappln.projectview&amp;amp;upload_id=946" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.worldarchitecturenews.com/index.php?fuseaction=wanappln.projectview&amp;amp;upload_id=946"&gt;http://www.worldarchitectur...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:46:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Singapore&amp;#8217;s Floating Apartment Building</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/03/27/singapores-floating-apartment-building/#comment-1761672</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed. But even though the Twin Towers looked like fairly 'ordinary' buildings they were the first to use a revolutionary new design. If I'm not mistaken it was the first to use a central concrete core which allowed the outer walls to be made of steel and glass and each floor to be all open space.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But people saw what happened to what they thought was a standard building design so I have to wonder if unique designs like this would give the average person even less confidence.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Liszewski</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:04:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Singapore&amp;#8217;s Floating Apartment Building</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/03/27/singapores-floating-apartment-building/#comment-1761671</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But then again, the Twin Towers were brought down even though they *weren't* as exotically shaped as this project, so maybe people won't think the exotic shape has anything to do with that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CRConrad</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:54:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>