<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>OhGizmo! - Latest Comments in The Evergreen D900SX</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_the_evergreen_d900sx/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:25:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Evergreen D900SX</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/18/the-evergreen-d900sx/#comment-1752606</link><description>&lt;p&gt;120 fps happens to be the least common multiple of 24 and 30 fps. When such clips are shuffled together the end result becomes 120 fps with lots of dropped frames. It is a way of doing resampling.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gabest</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:25:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Evergreen D900SX</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/18/the-evergreen-d900sx/#comment-1752605</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LOL!  $52 shipping&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 04:07:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Evergreen D900SX</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/18/the-evergreen-d900sx/#comment-1752604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Erm.  Time lapse?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Wade</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 04:19:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>