Hello! Community Page
- www.ohgizmo.com Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- very interesting from where i live nothing like this ever happen lol
- NICE ... Love it... But why is it, that every one does things with the C64 and NO ONE remembers the C128?
- While I wouldn't do such a thing, I'm sure there are some fellas out there who would like to take videos in the Fitness Club/Gym's locker room in order to be enjoyed at a later time....
- its good that they had invented another item like this one, and i think many will buy this and enjoy having this.
- It's Perfect, exceptionally soothing, unfortunately, I have just learned they have discontinued it - at least under that name. They offered me some other stuff, which supposedly does the same,...
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
What a ridiculous point of view! Why encourage homogenization? What a dull world this would be if everybody thought like you.
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
The engine is probably/should be a Honda never-fail gas engine, so why worry. I bet this helicopter will have a satisfactory survival rate overall.
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
What an uneducated racial remark, He forgets that there are more then 50 % of people on the internet that do not speak english. He has the attitude of a Frenchman who refuse to speak English because they claim that French is the Global language.
I speak 5 languages including Dutch, a pity you did not go to school in Holland.
3 years ago
Viva villa , viva the elicopter Gen-H4 is the things too close to FREEDOM, ciao Arnaldo
3 years ago
Arnaldo
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
colors check out my way to fly click the link
2 years ago
Conclusion: This is a dangerous toy and should be outlawed. The makers are not allowed to test the safety chute, nor do real forward flight (at speed) in Japan because both activities are AGAINST THE LAW in Japan. I have new respect for the Japanese government.
FAQ:
Q: Why is it dangerous?
A#1: All engines quit sooner or later, especially the two stroke engine type used in the H2. No one has yet invented a "no quit" engine. In addition, these engines (it uses 4 engines, not one) are not certified for aircraft use.
A#2: It's rotors are fixed pitch therefore it can only climb as the engine rpm slowly increases. If (read when) the drive system fails, it drops like a rock. That's why it's only demo'd with a very skinny and light pilot. A real person has no margin of safety when a downdraft hits, or a power line is spotted at the last minute. If it's warm out, it even has less lifting ability.
A#3. There is no dual seat trainer. People who train solo in any rotary or other aircraft are considered suicidal by the aircraft industry since most (yes it's true) will crash.
Q: If it has 4 engines, why must I be concerned if one should quit, after all, it can still fly on 3, and land on 2.
A: Once an engine quits, the remaining engines run hotter. This causes the unreliable two stroke engines to overheat and likely quit suddenly as well. The only way to prevent this is to immediately put larger jets in the carburetors of the remaining 3 engines while flying (impossible to do).
Q: Has the emergency parachute been tested by the manufacturer?
A: NO. However, they are asking dealers/buyers to test it for them! Do you want to buy something from a company that places so little value on your life?
Q: Why should we listen to you?
A: Because I care and am a student helicopter pilot with 21 hours of flight time.
Q: Is that all the reasons it's dangerous?
A: No, it's just a start. Read about the experience of those people who bought a kit called the Mini-500 that also used a two stroke engine against the wishes of the engine manufacturer (Rotax engine made by Bombardier). Just Google "Death by Mini-500" and do some reading.
Good Luck.
2 years ago
2 years ago
To buy into that one, you have to be either some kind of grotesque, stellar-stupid or utterly desperate to get out of church. I'm leaning toward the latter. I'll the first to admit that priests have proven to be child-molesting liars and shameless, greedy thieves but that fact does not disprove the existence of God. People have no excuse for believing their lies en masse ? but that's another discussion. Back to the point?
There are 12 tones in music (repeated several times to form a piano keyboard or guitar fretboard) and a *trained* musician can usually play no more than 8 (66%) of them (in a diminished scale) at any given time before it, subjectively, sounds bad. I HAVE NEVER HEARD ANY BIRD SING OFF-KEY, not even once, EVER! Have you? Birds go on and on and on and it ALWAYS SOUNDS GOOD ? or at least interesting ? but never a sour note!
Are bird songs the result of random note selection? It would have to, according to the preposterous theory that you hold so dear (because it has relieved you of the burden of morality, self-denial and self-control). To say that bird songs were "perfected over millions of years" (blah, blah, blah) and are no longer changing, would imply that "random, natural selection" has CEASED to operate as a force in the lives of birds. Something evolution cannot do BECAUSE IT DOES NOT EXIST! DAMN! Why is it so hard to accept something that is so obvious?!
In accord with that TOTALLY BOGUS THEORY of Evolution, bird songs (along with *every* other aspect of *every* other living thing) should ALWAYS be in flux. This would necessarily require that an appreciable portion of birdsong note selection end up perhaps working for a given species of bird but sounding "off-key" to humans.
Do birds *need* their songs to sound good to members of a species with which they cannot mate? Why? Is on-key note selection a fixed default? How? How could *any* bird possibly arrange it, much less *all* of them? Granted, the parrot and a very few other birds can mimic sounds, but such birds are comparatively few and even so, the ability to make any kind of sound has got to have little (if any) value as a survival skill to an animal whose primary survival mechanism would have to be winged flight.
Now I know you've been trained to twist ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING into survival terms and therefore it's incumbent upon you to make something up. You may even be able to cite one flawed example which I'll pick apart later, but I just thought I 'd put it out there to see what you'll say. Ok faithful followers of the Church of Evolution, get to work? and remember, ridicule is not evidence! :-)
2 years ago
2 years ago
p.o.box Mogoditshane
Botswana.
THANKING YOU IN ADVANCE.
REGARDS OSCAR.
2 years ago
So, you never heard seagull screch then,you dumbass?
2 years ago
2 years ago
What do you call someone who speaks two languages?
Bilingual.
What do you call someone who speaks three languages?
Trilingual.
What do you call someone who speaks only one language?
American
1 year ago
I speak 7.
1 year ago
1 month ago