<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>OhGizmo! - Latest Comments in OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; The Ultimate Audio Cable</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 00:41:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; The Ultimate Audio Cable</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/04/the-ultimate-audio-cable/#comment-1752006</link><description>Amorphous metals are not particularly new, nor were they developed for defense purposes.  Their principal use is in the special magnetic steel used in the cores of electric power transformers. Magnetic domains are crystals, so the elimination of crystals changes the magnetic properties of the steel such that it doesn't heat up as much as its magnetic field is repeatedly reversed.  While amorphous metals are undoubtedly used in other applications, I rather doubt that amorphous copper would be of great benefit in audio work.  I would also want to investigate whether the crystals re-form in the wire-drawing process, which severely deforms the wire and thus necessitates annealing between successive dies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Kinsler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 00:41:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; The Ultimate Audio Cable</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/04/the-ultimate-audio-cable/#comment-1752005</link><description>"That is driving audiophiles to say things about these cables like..."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That sounds like a classic audiophile quote - utterly lacking in substance, reasoning or measurable qualities.  I have *never* seen a hi-fi magazine measure audio quality the right way, namely using calibrated test equipment and measuring distortion and frequency response across the audio spectrum.  Until they do, I will say that all hi-fi articles are shit, because they aren't giving results in any meaningful terms.  The vagueness of audiophile reviews and articles is indistinguishable from the vagueness used by fake psychics to con people - that should tell you something...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Grab</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 05:41:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; The Ultimate Audio Cable</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/04/the-ultimate-audio-cable/#comment-1752004</link><description>These were made by a consortium of cable manufacturers of the likes of Monster to help their retarded customers justify buying a $200 HDMI cable...sheesh, audiophiles are just hearing things...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">I Sweilem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 12:54:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; The Ultimate Audio Cable</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/04/the-ultimate-audio-cable/#comment-1752003</link><description>If you're stupid enough to spend six large on a single set of audio cables, when you could probably hire an actual chamber music quintet for a week or two at that price, you deserve to be robbed blind.  However, if you're that rich and that stupid, you could hire me as a consultant to tell you when you were doing stupid things with your money instead.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Wade</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 01:28:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OhGizmo!  &amp;raquo; Archive  &amp;raquo; The Ultimate Audio Cable</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2005/08/04/the-ultimate-audio-cable/#comment-1752002</link><description>Ahhh.  The price of pure sound without electronic distortion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Next thing you know, they will put price restrictions on sound waves entering your ear!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">William P</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 18:49:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>