<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>OhGizmo! - Latest Comments in TwistTogether Lamps: Now Available</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ohgizmo.disqus.com/ohgizmo_raquo_archive_raquo_twisttogether_lamps_now_available/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:31:18 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: TwistTogether Lamps: Now Available</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/12/07/twisttogether-lamps-now-available/#comment-1764892</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're kidding me... Apparently if I want to refer to more than one Lego brick, I have to in fact say "LEGO bricks" or "LEGO pieces" instead of just "legos." That's nuts. I REFUSE!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evan Ackerman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 00:31:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TwistTogether Lamps: Now Available</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/12/07/twisttogether-lamps-now-available/#comment-1764891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the plural of lego is just lego, not legos. no s.  like its sheep not sheeps. it really shouldn't piss me of so much. but it does. sorry.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:45:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>