http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/enMon, 10 Dec 2007 01:59:18 -0000http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/12/04/wacom-cintiq-tablet-displays-sexy-but-not-sexy-enough/#comment-1764860220 cd/m2 is bright enough to hurt your eyes if viewing for extended periods of time. Regardless of maximum brightness, professional use needs 100 to no more than 140 cd/m2 as a white point depending on the nature of its use. At 550:1 that means you get a black of .4 cd/m2 which isn't bad but if it's to simulated printed work, .25 cd/m2 would be the gold standard. At the time the 21UX debuted 1600x1200 panels were still extremely expensive. Now that they've come down, that could use a shifted price rather than cheaper models used to reduce the point of entry.kavMon, 10 Dec 2007 01:59:18 -0000http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/12/04/wacom-cintiq-tablet-displays-sexy-but-not-sexy-enough/#comment-1764858And the company's pronounced 'whack-um' though many people think it's 'way-calm'MehTue, 04 Dec 2007 14:53:12 -0000http://www.ohgizmo.com/2007/12/04/wacom-cintiq-tablet-displays-sexy-but-not-sexy-enough/#comment-1764859It's pronounced sin - teek'AnonymousTue, 04 Dec 2007 10:56:39 -0000