<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>OhGizmo! - Latest Comments in Panasonic Introduces 3D Washing Machine</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ohgizmo.disqus.com/panasonic_introduces_3d_washing_machine/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:37:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Panasonic Introduces 3D Washing Machine</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/08/04/panasonic-introduces-3d-washing-machine/#comment-77433362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems a pretty good invention, but still I see and expect many issues will rise from this invention.  Another thing is the price wasn't mentioned in this article.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Modern Furniture</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:37:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Panasonic Introduces 3D Washing Machine</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/08/04/panasonic-introduces-3d-washing-machine/#comment-13975440</link><description>&lt;p&gt;well, I would be surprised to learn if anybody achieved washing my clothes in only 2 dimensions. Clothes would come out awfully flat I'd think. And centrifugal force dictates that tilting the drum would make no difference. Also, to my knowledge and experience, every modern washing machine has a sensor picking up erratic drum movement and subsequent motor adjustments to hinder unwanted machine-tumblings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only innovation that matters here is maybe the energy saving one, but we've had energy saving washing machines for a decade now - all I see are small additions and improvements...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tommyhj</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:21:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>