<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>OhGizmo! - Latest Comments in Science Thursday: Smallest Possible Letters Written With Atomic Pen</title><link>http://ohgizmo.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ohgizmo.disqus.com/science_thursday_smallest_possible_letters_written_with_atomic_pen/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:24:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Science Thursday: Smallest Possible Letters Written With Atomic Pen</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/23/science-thursday-smallest-possible-letters-written-with-atomic-pen/#comment-3260891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Heh, I was waiting for someone to bring that up :p&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's a little bit tongue-in-cheek for them to say (and me to repeat), I agree... But when you get much smaller than atoms, you're starting to get into particle-wave duality and stuff, where things don't really HAVE positions. But maybe the LHC will spit out something new to right with, who knows?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As to the atom sizes, yes, He has a smaller diameter than Si. But, you can't write on a He surface. It's also specific to the atomic force microscope that it spits out Si atoms. So maybe we'll invent a new microscope that uses a smaller diameter atom.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Personally, I dislike the idea that we've reached some kind of limit, here. I prefer to think that we have no idea what we'll be capable of in the future :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evan Ackerman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:24:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Science Thursday: Smallest Possible Letters Written With Atomic Pen</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/23/science-thursday-smallest-possible-letters-written-with-atomic-pen/#comment-3252951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;“it’s not possible to write any smaller than this.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That is an incredibly naive statement.  Firstly, "atoms are the absolute smallest things stable enough to let us push them around" that we know of right now.&lt;br&gt;Secondly, these are silicon atoms.  If you use carbon atoms (one less electron shell) wouldn't it be smaller?  Or helium (two less electron shells)?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bah!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skeptic</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:04:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Science Thursday: Smallest Possible Letters Written With Atomic Pen</title><link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2008/10/23/science-thursday-smallest-possible-letters-written-with-atomic-pen/#comment-3252942</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It could've been a lot worse. Thank God they didnt write "F1RST"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">genterara</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:03:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>